Cogveo is built for every legal document type. Underneath is a general extract–grade–cite engine: trained models that work on day one, bespoke ones built in days, and the same defensible workflow for any high-volume review.
Cogveo ships with a library of trained extraction models, and builds bespoke ones for a client's own document types fast — no data-science project required.
Out of the box, Cogveo extracts dozens of standard clause types — parties, governing law, change of control, liability caps, indemnities, non-compete and more — from models trained on a large annotated contract corpus. No training, no setup.
Need a model for a document type or clause unique to a client — a specific schedule, a regulatory form, an in-house template? Cogveo trains a custom extractor from a handful of examples and drops it into the same review grid, in days not months.
The same extract–grade–cite engine handles any high-volume document job — in any practice area.
Apply a clause change across thousands of contracts after a regulatory or policy shift — find every affected document, update it in Word, and track the change.
Mass redundancy and settlement agreements at scale, consultation packs, and ET1 / tribunal bundle review — consistent across every employee file.
Triage and review large claim document sets to a single, defensible standard — with a citation behind every finding.
Find, extract and grade a clause type across your whole contract estate — for a compliance question, a risk sweep, or an audit.
UK employment tribunals, employer-side — the same engine, a different playbook.
A restructuring makes 200 roles redundant; 45 employees bring tribunal claims — mostly unfair dismissal, several adding age or disability discrimination. The defence has to be consistent across all 45, or it falls apart.
Cogveo loads every ET1, ET3 and bundle from SharePoint or iManage and builds one grid — each claim's pleaded claims, Acas time limits, redundancy selection score and loss claimed, extracted verbatim with a citation to the page. Each claim is graded Green to Black against the firm's own assessment rules, so the team sees instantly which to settle, which to fight, and which are out of time — and spots the cross-claim pattern, like every discrimination claim tracing back to the same manager's low scores.
Out comes a case-assessment register, a consolidated exposure estimate, and ET3 first-draft inputs — with every decision audit-logged for the hearing. The lawyer keeps the judgement; Cogveo takes the volume.